wemail is the only alternative your existing Postmark code already speaks. One line changed, less than half the price at 100k, 12-month logs, EU residency by default.
125k sends costs €115. wemail meters the same volume at €49 — €792/yr back.
Good — but wemail keeps 12 months of searchable logs, so last quarter's issue is still debuggable.
EU region is a separate opt-in setup. wemail stores and processes in the EU by default — GDPR and DPA ready.
Every Postmark alternative asks you to rewrite your integration — new SDK, new webhook formats, new templates. wemail's shim speaks Postmark's wire format: keep your client, change the host, and you're sending.
The short version — full comparison here.
| CAPABILITY | WEMAIL | POSTMARK |
|---|---|---|
| Price at 100k sends | €49/mo | €115/mo |
| Log retention | 12 months | 45 days |
| Migration effort | 1 line changed | — |
| Inbox placement | 99.18% · published live | ✓ published |
| EU data residency | ✓ default | opt-in region |
Plan-based estimate, cheapest covering tier · Competitor pricing as of September 2026, based on published list prices — verify current pricing with each provider.
It depends on what you're leaving for. If it's price, retention or EU residency (Postmark's deliverability is genuinely good) — and you don't want to rewrite your integration — wemail is the only alternative with a drop-in Postmark shim.
No. Change the host URL to api.wemail.io and your existing client keeps working — send() calls, templates and suppressions included.
Traffic shifts gradually over 60 minutes with both providers live, Postmark stays warm for 30 days, and rollback is one API call.
3,000 sends per month, forever. No credit card. Your Postmark account stays untouched until you cut over.





